<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chicago Law Blogger &#187; Entrepreneurs and Venture/Angel Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagolawblogger.com/category/entrepreneurs-and-ventureangel-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagolawblogger.com</link>
	<description>No Holds Barred! Business, Estate and Tax Planning for the Savy Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top Chef: Business Law and Ceviche</title>
		<link>http://chicagolawblogger.com/top-chef-business-law-and-ceviche/</link>
		<comments>http://chicagolawblogger.com/top-chef-business-law-and-ceviche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs and Venture/Angel Capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagolawblogger.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever watch Top Chef and wonder how on earth any of the contestants, no matter how talented, become No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever watch <a href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/show-patrol/2009/08/viva-rick-bayless-chicago-chef-wins-top-chef-masters.html">Top Chef </a>and wonder how on earth any of the contestants, no matter how talented, become </p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chicagolawblogger.com/top-chef-business-law-and-ceviche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Start-Up Businesses: Deduct your Start-Up Expenses&#8230;Seriously</title>
		<link>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-start-up-businesses-deduct-your-start-up-expenses-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-start-up-businesses-deduct-your-start-up-expenses-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs and Venture/Angel Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagolawblogger.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, in order to deduct a &#8220;business&#8221; expense, one must actually be engaged in&#8230;well&#8230;a business. We can all think of business expenses: office rent; employee salaries; paper and staples. Usually, these types of expenses don&#8217;t show up until the business has started. But what about all the money spent prior to the big ribbon cutting [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally, in order to deduct a &#8220;business&#8221; expense, one must actually be engaged in&#8230;well&#8230;a business.  We can all think of business expenses: office rent; employee salaries; paper and staples.  Usually, these types of expenses don&#8217;t show up until the business has started.  But what about all the money spent prior to the big ribbon cutting ceremony?  These expenses can be deducted&#8230;but in a special way. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000195----000-.html">Section 195</a> (and <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/aprqtr/26cfr1.195-1T.htm">regulations</a>) of the Internal Revenue Code&#8230;aptly titled &#8220;Start-up expenditures&#8221; (very imaginative of Congress). </p>
<p>What&#8217;s deductible?  Start-up expenditures, of course.  The primary expenses here are &#8220;investigation&#8221; and &#8220;creation&#8221; expenses. </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Investigation</span></p>
<p>Think of investigation expenses as your Sherlock Holmes expenses.  You&#8217;re out there with your magnifying glass trying to sniff out a good business.  Maybe you have to go talk to the Dalai Lama as part of this process.  Maybe (more likely) you go to one of those big<a href="http://www.ifeinfo.com/"> franchising trade shows </a>and talk with 50 different salesmen about your dream to run a hotdog cart.  Either way&#8230;these expenses are &#8220;investigation&#8221; expenses and deductible. </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Creation</span></p>
<p>Creation expenses&#8230;these expenses are what they sound like.  You hire someone to help you get the business up and running&#8230;boom, creation expense.  You travel to Abu Dhabi to get a blessing for your business from a monk&#8230;boom, creation expense.  The main difference here from an investigation expense is that you incur creation expenses once the investigation phase is over. </p>
<p> A few other details.  First, these expenses are deductible in the same way they would be if the business was operating.  So, if you incur meals and entertainment expenses you still only get a 50% deduction.  Also, these expenses are not necessarily deductible all at once.  Much depends on the total amount of these deductions&#8230;generally, you can deduct up to $5,000 in the first year.  Then, you can deduct the rest over a 180-month (that&#8217;s 15 years) period.   But, if you have more than $50,000 in start-up expenses these rules change a bit (I&#8217;m not trying to be difficult&#8230;the rules really are nuanced and complicated).</p>
<p>This deduction can be forgone if the owner decides to <a href="http://accountant.intuit.com/practice_resources/articles/tax/article.aspx?file=tmdd_capitalization">&#8220;capitalize&#8221; rather than deduct these expenses</a>.  If these amounts are capitalized, it means the owner adds this amount to his or her basis in the business.  The decision whether to deduct or capitalize is one that should be analyzed&#8230;if the business has a big upside, capitalizing may make more sense.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-start-up-businesses-deduct-your-start-up-expenses-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Venture Capital: Entrepreneurs grab your Calculators</title>
		<link>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-venture-capital-entrepreneurs-grab-your-calculators/</link>
		<comments>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-venture-capital-entrepreneurs-grab-your-calculators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs and Venture/Angel Capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagolawblogger.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a really nice article on the numbers/considerations underlying a first-round venture capital funding. It is so important in these deals to work the calculator&#8230;otherwise I don&#8217;t know how you figure out the real terms of the deal. No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a really <a href="http://bostonvcblog.typepad.com/vc/2009/07/in-vc-deals-price-doesnt-matter-but-the-promote-does.html#comment-6a00d83424781853ef01157122a549970c">nice article </a>on the numbers/considerations underlying a first-round venture capital funding.  It is so important in these deals to work the calculator&#8230;otherwise I don&#8217;t know how you figure out the real terms of the deal.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chicagolawblogger.com/chicago-venture-capital-entrepreneurs-grab-your-calculators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
